mirror of
https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden.git
synced 2026-03-26 03:39:20 -07:00
Add Note for Synology DSM Docker Users
@@ -161,6 +161,14 @@ Docker uses the `FORWARD` chain instead of the default INPUT chain. If the machi
|
|||||||
chain = FORWARD
|
chain = FORWARD
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
###### Note for Synology DSM Docker Users
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Please set the `chain` to `DOCKER-USER`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```ini
|
||||||
|
chain = DOCKER-USER
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
###### Note for Docker Users with Fail2Ban v1.1.1.dev1 (and possibly newer)
|
###### Note for Docker Users with Fail2Ban v1.1.1.dev1 (and possibly newer)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With Fail2Ban v1.1.1.dev1 the default `banactions` for Debian changed from iptables to nftables (see [here](https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/commit/d0d07285234871bad3dc0c359d0ec03365b6dddc)). Docker (at least version 25.0.3) on the other hand still uses iptables. Hence, the requests to the Docker containers are not blocked with `banaction = %(banaction_allports)s`. In this scenario, use
|
With Fail2Ban v1.1.1.dev1 the default `banactions` for Debian changed from iptables to nftables (see [here](https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/commit/d0d07285234871bad3dc0c359d0ec03365b6dddc)). Docker (at least version 25.0.3) on the other hand still uses iptables. Hence, the requests to the Docker containers are not blocked with `banaction = %(banaction_allports)s`. In this scenario, use
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user